May 28, 2020 · In an async function, promise rejections are exceptions (as you know, since you're using try / catch with them), and exceptions propagate through the async call tree until/unless they're caught.

Jul 21, 2016 · Does using the 'catch, when' feature make exception handling faster because the handler is skipped as such and the stack unwinding can happen much earlier as when compared to handling …

I recommend using catch(Exception ex) when you plan to reuse the exception variable only, and catch (alone) in other cases. Just a matter of style for the second use case, but if personally find it more …

I think that this only works if you raise and then catch the exception, but not if you try getting the traceback before raising an exception object that you create, which you might want to do in some …

try { WebId = new Guid(queryString["web"]); } catch (FormatException) { WebId = Guid.Empty; } catch (OverflowException) { WebId = Guid.Empty; } Is there a way to catch both exceptions and only set …

The third try-catch block is different. When it throws the exception, it will change the source and the stack trace, so that it will appear that the exception has been thrown from this method, from that very …

In the second scheme, if the promise p rejects, then the .catch() handler is called. If you return a normal value or a promise that eventually resolves from the .catch() handler (thus "handling" the error), then …

Jul 27, 2014 · 62 You cannot use try-catch statements to handle exceptions thrown asynchronously, as the function has "returned" before any exception is thrown. You should instead use the promise.then …

What is the difference between catch and catch (Exception e)? Both of your examples are the same and equally useless - they just catch an exception and then rethrow it.

Nov 26, 2009 · Assuming C# < 6, the most efficient is to catch a specific Exception type and do handling based on that. Any catch-all handling can be done separately